Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Volvo V70 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2021
Volvo V70
2007 - 2011
Body: Crossover / SUVEstate car / wagon
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.01.6 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 116 - 240 HP114 - 304 HP
Torque: 200 - 500 NM190 - 441 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11.9 seconds6.9 - 13.2 seconds
In general, Volvo V70 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Skoda Kodiaq. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 8.04.3 - 11.3
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo V70. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 187 - 197 mm (7.4 - 7.8 inches)143 - 151 mm (5.6 - 5.9 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kodiaq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.82 m
Width: 1.88 m1.86 m
Height: 1.69 m1.54 m
Skoda Kodiaq is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres575 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litresno data
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo V70 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V70, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 2`313 kg~ 2`292 kg
Net weight:~ 1`641 kg~ 1`674 kg
Load capacity:~ 672 kg~ 618 kg
Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 8 procentiem more than Volvo V70. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 19 8003800
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Volvo V70 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv