Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Renault Koleos 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 240 HP | 130 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 500 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.9 seconds | 9.3 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.0 | 4.6 - 8.3 | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Koleos. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Koleos. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 187 - 197 mm (7.4 - 7.8 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Koleos can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm longer than the Renault Koleos, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 538 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1690 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 297 litres more trunk space than the Renault Koleos. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 375 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Koleos, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`313 kg | ~ 2`210 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`641 kg | ~ 1`674 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 672 kg | ~ 536 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Renault Koleos. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Renault Koleos has
| |