Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Mitsubishi Outlander is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 - 240 HP | 121 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 500 NM | 190 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 - 11.9 seconds | 8.7 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 - 8.0 | 1.7 - 10.6 | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Outlander. On average, a Skoda Kodiaq with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Mitsubishi Outlander. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 187 - 197 mm (7.4 - 7.8 inches) | 190 - 216 mm (7.5 - 8.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.68 m | |
| Skoda Kodiaq and Mitsubishi Outlander are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 835 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2065 litres | 1792 litres | |
|
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kodiaq has 285 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 273 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 1.6 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Skoda Kodiaq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`313 kg | ~ 2`182 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`641 kg | ~ 1`591 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 672 kg | ~ 591 kg | |
| Skoda Kodiaq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Therefore, Skoda Kodiaq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 800 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kodiaq has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |