Skoda Kodiaq 2016 vs Chevrolet Captiva 2015

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Skoda Kodiaq
2016 - 2021
Chevrolet Captiva
2015 - 2018
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.4 - 2.02.2 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 116 - 240 HP167 - 258 HP
Torque: 200 - 500 NM230 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.9 - 11.9 seconds9.8 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.8 - 8.07.8 - 9.5
Skoda Kodiaq petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Captiva. On average, Skoda Kodiaq equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Captiva.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.69 m4.67 m
Width: 1.88 m1.85 m
Height: 1.69 m1.73 m
Skoda Kodiaq is larger, but lower.
Skoda Kodiaq is 2 cm longer than the Chevrolet Captiva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kodiaq is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 835 litres477 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
2065 litres1577 litres
Skoda Kodiaq has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Kodiaq has 358 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Captiva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kodiaq (by 488 litres).
Turning diameter: 12.2 meters12.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Kodiaq is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Captiva.
Gross weight: ~ 2`313 kg~ 2`411 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 19 800no data
Pros and Cons: Skoda Kodiaq has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv