Skoda Karoq 2021 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi ASX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq and Mitsubishi ASX have the same engine power, but Skoda Karoq torque is 145 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.6 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is larger, but slightly lower. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 7 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 115 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |