Skoda Karoq 2021 vs Mazda CX-30 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq engine produces 34 HP more power than Mazda CX-30, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Mazda CX-30. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.0 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Karoq consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-30, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.56 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-30, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1406 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 91 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-30. The Mazda CX-30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 224 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-30, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`188 | 1`969 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 22 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Mazda CX-30 has
| |