Skoda Karoq 2021 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 99 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 9.20 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 67 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1383 litres | |
| Skoda Karoq has 70 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 247 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.7 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`188 kg | 2`430 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`545 kg | 1`818 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 643 kg | 612 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 43 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |