Skoda Karoq 2021 vs Cupra Ateca 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Cupra Ateca) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 4.9 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 150 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq and Cupra Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 485 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 36 litres more trunk space than the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.1 metres more than that of the Cupra Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`188 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |