Skoda Karoq 2021 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 40 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is larger. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 51 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`188 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 600 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
BMW X2 has
| |