Skoda Karoq 2019 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 6.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 590 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Karoq is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 615 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1655 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 94 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 25 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`213 kg | 2`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`480 kg | 1`635 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 733 kg | 645 kg | |
| Skoda Karoq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |