Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq engine produces 27 HP more power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |