Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq engine produces 40 HP more power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Seat Ateca. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Karoq could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 510 litres | |
| Skoda Karoq has 11 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ateca is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |