Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 13 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Volvo XC60. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.4 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |