Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Skoda Karoq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota RAV4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 149 HP | |
Torque: | 340 NM | 206 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 11 seconds | |
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq engine produces 1 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 134 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 6.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
820 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Toyota RAV4 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.60 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.69 m | |
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 22 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 580 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 59 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.1 metres less than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`128 | 2`120 | |
Safety: | |||
Toyota RAV4 scores higher in safety tests. The Toyota RAV4 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 18 600 | 24 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |