Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 55 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 123 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 6.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 915 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 5.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |