Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| 790 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Karoq has 29 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Skoda Karoq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 600 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |