Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Karoq has 54 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Skoda Karoq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.4 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |