Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.1 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Skoda Karoq has 54 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Skoda Karoq uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |