Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar E-Pace, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 713 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 947 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.56 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 16 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |