Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Citroen C5 Aircross 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 62 HP less power than Citroen C5 Aircross, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Citroen C5 Aircross. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 186 mm (7.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Citroen C5 Aircross can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Citroen C5 Aircross version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
| Skoda Karoq is 12 cm shorter than the Citroen C5 Aircross, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Karoq is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 59 litres less trunk space than the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C5 Aircross. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Citroen C5 Aircross is better rated in child safety tests. The Citroen C5 Aircross scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Citroen C5 Aircross has
| |