Skoda Karoq 2017 vs BMW X2 2017

 
Skoda Karoq
2017 - 2020
BMW X2
2017 -
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.6 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP190 HP
Torque: 250 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.9 seconds7.7 seconds
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving.
Skoda Karoq engine produces 75 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 150 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.44.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres51 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1160 km on highway1130 km on highway
790 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 176 mm (6.9 inches)182 mm (7.2 inches)
BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Pretty reliable engine with great durability. Overall, the chains are more reliable than on BMW N-series engines. However, they do tend to stretch under heavy use. The engine needs good quality fuel, ...  More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.36 m
Width: 1.84 m1.82 m
Height: 1.61 m1.53 m
Skoda Karoq is larger.
Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 521 litres470 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1630 litres1355 litres
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity.
Skoda Karoq has 51 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9102`190
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 00020 400
Pros and Cons: Skoda Karoq has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
BMW X2 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv