Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
|
Audi Q3 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 69 HP less power than Audi Q3, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Audi Q3. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1450 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |