Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2020
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Hybrid | |
Petrol engines (Skoda Karoq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Volkswagen Tiguan) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.5 seconds | |
Skoda Karoq and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 1.8 | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.51 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
Skoda Karoq is 13 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Karoq is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 476 litres | |
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 45 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The Volkswagen Tiguan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 23 600 | 32 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
| |