Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 60 NM more than Toyota C-HR. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Karoq engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is larger. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 5 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 144 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |