Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Nissan Qashqai 2017

 
Skoda Karoq
2017 - 2021
Nissan Qashqai
2017 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 150 HP115 HP
Torque: 250 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.6 seconds12.9 seconds
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive.
Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.6
Real fuel consumption: 7.2 l/100km8.2 l/100km
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1020 km on highway1050 km on highway
690 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 176 mm (6.9 inches)180 mm (7.1 inches)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 330'000 km280'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Karoq engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 8 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.
Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ...  More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.38 m4.39 m
Width: 1.84 m1.81 m
Height: 1.61 m1.59 m
Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 521 litres430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1630 litres1585 litres
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 91 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The Nissan Qashqai may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 45 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9291`880
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 18 20014 600
Pros and Cons: Skoda Karoq has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Nissan Qashqai has
  • timing chain engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv