Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Skoda Karoq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Karoq engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi ASX gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi ASX can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi ASX version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Karoq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1206 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 137 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 424 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |