Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Jeep Compass 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 20 HP less power than Jeep Compass, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2017: It can have Freedom Drive I or II - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally, the car has front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The Freedom Drive I system is designed primarily for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. The Freedom Drive II version adds an off-road four-wheel drive mode, traction control, optimized engine and transmission performance for rock crawling, and hill descent control (not in EU editions). | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 215 mm (8.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Compass can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 63 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Compass. The Jeep Compass may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jeep Compass is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |