Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 150 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 601 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1386 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 80 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |