Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 150 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 204 mm (8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jaguar E-Pace can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar E-Pace, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 713 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jaguar E-Pace (by 947 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.56 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |