Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq and Jaguar E-Pace have the same engine power, but Skoda Karoq torque is 130 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Karoq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar E-Pace, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 713 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.46 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Jaguar E-Pace is better rated in child safety tests. The Jaguar E-Pace scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 22 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |