Skoda Karoq 2017 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Karoq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (BMW X2) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq engine produces 25 HP more power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 30 NM more than BMW X2. Despite the higher power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 1.9 | |
|
The BMW X2 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Karoq consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Karoq could require 540 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 36 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1890 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X2 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Karoq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Karoq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from four 4x4 versions of Skoda Karoq 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is larger. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1290 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 111 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 340 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 20 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
BMW X2 has
| |