Skoda Karoq 2017 vs BMW X2 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.7 seconds | |
|
BMW X2 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 42 HP less power than BMW X2, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X2. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X2. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW X1, BMW 2 sērija | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X2 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is larger. Skoda Karoq is 2 cm longer than the BMW X2, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1355 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 51 litres more trunk space than the BMW X2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 275 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X2, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 2`055 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 22 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
BMW X2 has
| |