Skoda Karoq 2017 vs BMW X1 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
BMW X1 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 42 HP less power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 30 NM less than BMW X1. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
BMW X1 2019: This generation BMW features the Haldex Generation V proactive all-wheel-drive system, which sends 100% of torque to the front wheels as standard. The system analyzes data from the ABS and engine control units and can increase pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement if required. If wheel spin is detected, torque can be split evenly between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 2 sērija, BMW X2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW X1 2019 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X1, 2 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 505 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1550 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 16 litres more trunk space than the BMW X1. The BMW X1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 80 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 2`155 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
BMW X1 has
| |