Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Audi Q3 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Skoda Karoq and Audi Q3 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 900 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1020 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi Q3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 173 mm (6.8 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 360'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Seat Leon, Seat Ateca | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine Audi Q3 2014 1.4 engine: The 1.4 TSI engine from the EA211 family (code CZEA, 150 hp) is a modern turbocharged unit designed to balance performance and efficiency. It features direct fuel injection, a timing belt drive, and the ACT cylinder deactivation system, which shuts down two cylinders under light load to reduce fuel consumption. In everyday use the engine offers good ... More about Audi Q3 2014 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1365 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 265 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.9 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`929 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |