Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 90 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Karoq consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 200 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |