Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 90 HP less power than Volvo XC60, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Volvo XC60. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 8.5 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Karoq consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Karoq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo XC60 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Volvo XC60 2013 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1630 litres | 1455 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Karoq (by 175 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.8 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`915 kg | 2`270 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`303 kg | 1`935 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 612 kg | 335 kg | |
| Skoda Karoq load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem more than Volvo XC60. Therefore, Skoda Karoq is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 16 000 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |