Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
Volkswagen Tiguan is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Karoq engine produces 35 HP less power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Tiguan. Due to the lower power, Skoda Karoq reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 7.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Karoq consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that by driving the Skoda Karoq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Karoq consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
690 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 176 mm (6.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Tiguan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.49 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.67 m | |
Skoda Karoq is 11 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Karoq is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 615 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | 1655 litres | |
Volkswagen Tiguan has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 94 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Tiguan (by 25 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means Skoda Karoq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`180 | |
Safety: | |||
Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in safety tests. The Volkswagen Tiguan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 18 600 | 17 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |