Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volvo XC60 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 136 - 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 320 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | 6.9 - 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.3 | 5.3 - 10.7 | |
|
Skoda Karoq petrol engines consumes on average 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Skoda Karoq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 26 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 11 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 26 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`401 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |