Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 110 - 210 HP | |
Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 200 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | 7.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.3 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
Skoda Karoq petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Tiguan. On average, Skoda Karoq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.38 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
Skoda Karoq is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 3 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 470 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Skoda Karoq has 51 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Tiguan. The Volkswagen Tiguan may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`174 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 23 200 | 10 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |