Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Seat Ateca 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 200 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 - 10.9 seconds | 8.3 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 - 6.9 | 4.3 - 5.3 | |
|
Skoda Karoq petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Seat Ateca. On average, Skoda Karoq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1630 litres | no data | |
| Skoda Karoq has 11 litres more trunk space than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Karoq is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`980 | ~ 1`937 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Seat Ateca is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 18 800 | 19 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Ateca has
| |