Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Audi Q5 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 150 - 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 320 - 620 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | 5.3 - 9.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.3 | 5.2 - 7.1 | |
|
Skoda Karoq petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q5. On average, Skoda Karoq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Skoda Karoq is smaller. Skoda Karoq is 28 cm shorter than the Audi Q5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Karoq is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1550 litres | |
|
Audi Q5 has more luggage space. Skoda Karoq has 29 litres less trunk space than the Audi Q5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`480 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q5 is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 23 200 | 26 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Audi Q5 has
| |