Skoda Karoq 2017 vs Audi Q3 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 190 HP | 140 - 211 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 - 400 NM | 250 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.8 - 10.7 seconds | 6.9 - 9.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 5.3 | 5.2 - 7.7 | |
|
Skoda Karoq petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. On average, Skoda Karoq equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.61 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Skoda Karoq and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 460 litres | |
|
Skoda Karoq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Karoq has 61 litres more trunk space than the Audi Q3. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`105 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Audi Q3 scores higher in safety tests. The Audi Q3 scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 24 000 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Karoq has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |