Skoda Kamiq 2023 vs Toyota C-HR 2023
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 2.0 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (Skoda Kamiq) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Toyota C-HR) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota C-HR is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Kamiq engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota C-HR, but torque is 60 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Due to the lower power, Skoda Kamiq reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 43 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is smaller. Skoda Kamiq is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota C-HR, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`776 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 22 600 | 31 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |