Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Suzuki Vitara 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Skoda Kamiq) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Vitara) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is more dynamic to drive. Skoda Kamiq engine produces 2 HP less power than Suzuki Vitara, but torque is 99 NM more than Suzuki Vitara. Despite less power, Skoda Kamiq reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.3 | 6.0 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kamiq consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Vitara, which means that by driving the Skoda Kamiq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1160 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1280 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Skoda Kamiq gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Suzuki Vitara 2018 1.6 engine: A simple and robust engine, not particularly demanding in terms of fuel quality.
High engine timing chain lifetime.
Tends to increase oil consumption, head gasket failures may occur. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Skoda Kamiq is larger, but lower. Skoda Kamiq is 7 cm longer than the Suzuki Vitara, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kamiq is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Kamiq has more luggage capacity. Skoda Kamiq has 25 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Vitara. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kamiq is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Vitara, which means Skoda Kamiq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 16 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Suzuki Vitara has
| |