Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Suzuki SX4 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Skoda Kamiq engine produces 10 HP more power than Suzuki SX4, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Suzuki SX4. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.4 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kamiq consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki SX4, which means that by driving the Skoda Kamiq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Swift, Suzuki Vitara | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Kamiq might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine: The K14C Boosterjet engine is equipped with a turbocharging system that enhances air intake, providing excellent torque as early as 1,500 RPM. However, the direct injection system contributes to carbon ... More about Suzuki SX4 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.59 m | |
| Skoda Kamiq is 6 cm shorter than the Suzuki SX4, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Kamiq is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1269 litres | |
| Skoda Kamiq has 30 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki SX4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 126 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kamiq is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki SX4, which means Skoda Kamiq can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`730 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 16 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Suzuki SX4 has
| |