Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Skoda Kamiq engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 96 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Kamiq consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Skoda Kamiq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Kamiq consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 190 mm (7.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Kamiq engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Kamiq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine: The Mitsubishi 4A92 is a 1.6-liter inline four-cylinder engine with a timing chain, known primarily for its low fuel consumption and relatively simple construction. It is widely used in models such as the Lancer and ASX. While the engine is fairly economical and inexpensive to maintain, it also has ... More about Mitsubishi ASX 2012 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.62 m | |
| Skoda Kamiq is 5 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi ASX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kamiq is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 442 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Skoda Kamiq has 42 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Kamiq (by 176 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kamiq is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`870 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |