Skoda Kamiq 2019 vs Honda HR-V 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 155 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Skoda Kamiq engine produces 20 HP more power than Honda HR-V, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Honda HR-V. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
|
The Skoda Kamiq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Kamiq consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda HR-V, which means that by driving the Skoda Kamiq over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Skoda Kamiq can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Skoda Kamiq version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Honda HR-V engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Skoda Superb, Skoda Scala, Audi A1, Audi Q3 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Skoda Kamiq engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Kamiq 2019 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.61 m | |
| Skoda Kamiq is 5 cm shorter than the Honda HR-V, 2 cm wider, while the height of Skoda Kamiq is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 400 litres | 431 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1395 litres | 1456 litres | |
|
Honda HR-V has more luggage space. Skoda Kamiq has 31 litres less trunk space than the Honda HR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda HR-V (by 61 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Kamiq is 0.6 metres less than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Skoda Kamiq can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 1`790 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Kamiq scores higher in safety tests, but Honda HR-V is better rated in child safety tests. The Skoda Kamiq scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Kamiq has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |