Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Volvo V40 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo V40 is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 31 HP less power than Volvo V40, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Volvo V40. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Felicia is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo V40 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller, but slightly higher. Skoda Felicia is 24 cm shorter than the Volvo V40, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Volvo V40 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Volvo V40, so Volvo V40 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volvo V40 has
| |