Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 26 HP less power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 86 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 610'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3, Volkswagen Bora, Seat Leon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 10 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |