Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Seat Cordoba 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 64 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 128 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
|
Seat Cordoba is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia and Seat Cordoba have the same engine power, but Skoda Felicia torque is 4 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Cordoba gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 10 cm longer than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Seat Cordoba has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Seat Cordoba, so Seat Cordoba quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |