Skoda Felicia 1998 vs Volkswagen Polo 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
| Skoda Felicia and Volkswagen Polo have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Polo is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Skoda Felicia consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Skoda Felicia over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Skoda Felicia consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 600 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 770 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 550 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
| Skoda Felicia is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, width is practically the same , while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Skoda Felicia can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`000 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Volkswagen Polo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than Volkswagen Polo, so Volkswagen Polo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |