Skoda Felicia 1996 vs Volkswagen Golf 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 64 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.5 seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf is a more dynamic driving. Skoda Felicia engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf, whereas torque is 78 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Due to the lower power, Skoda Felicia reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.4 | 5.1 | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Skoda Felicia consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Skoda Felicia could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 42 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Golf gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 700'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Skoda Felicia engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Golf, Audi 80, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Audi A6, Audi 80, Volkswagen Vento, Seat Alhambra | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Skoda Felicia might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine: This engine stands out for its durability and generally remains trouble-free until it has been used extensively over many years. Despite its robust construction, the wear and tear from prolonged use, ... More about Volkswagen Golf 1993 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.20 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.64 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Skoda Felicia is smaller. Skoda Felicia is 14 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Golf, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Skoda Felicia is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 466 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1426 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Skoda Felicia is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 750 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Skoda Felicia has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Skoda Felicia has
|
Volkswagen Golf has
| |